Wednesday, 28 November 2012

Jim Crow Laws

It's funny. We often hear blacks, guilt-ridden Whites and race-mixing degenerates lamenting - wailing and yammering - about the oh so evil 'Jim Crow Laws' of the American South, how terribly discriminatory and repressive they were towards the wonderful negroes. Personally, as an English observer, I had little idea what these laws were all about, or who this Jim Crow character really was. In my mind, not having done any research on the subject, I imagined Jim Crow to be some handsome, highly respected and charismatic White politician from the late 19th-early 20th century American South. A man who successfully advocated laws to protect the interests of the White American people, and ensure White hegemony in the South in particular. However, according to an online article that I read, there never was a character by the name of Jim Crow. In fact, to my surprise, in the South,  'Jim Crow' was (and perhaps still is) a pejorative term for blacks. 

As for the 'dreaded' and 'dastardly' laws themselves, it appears they were merely segregation laws intended to maintain a healthy White leadership and keep the races - as much as possible - from fraternising and cohabiting with one another. Basically to prevent the South from descending into a mongrelised, miscegenated hell-hole. Some may be inclined to ask, what is a good argument against the Jim Crow Laws? For me, that's easy. It takes no real mental strain at all. For despite the good intentions of White Southerners, these so-called 'Jim Crow' laws were totally insufficient, as they promoted segregation instead of complete separation of the races. For the only real answer to the race problem in the US, and any other (former) White country for that matter, is expulsion, repatriation and complete geographic racial separation. In a nutshell: Deportation, deportation, deportation. 

One may feel inclined to interject at this point and claim that such an idea is unrealistic, that such a massive operation is unfeasible or simply not possible. Well, to him I will say: not so. If you have ever been to a major airport in the UK, where thousands of South Asians clamour to board flights back to their motherland for holidays, family reunions and arranged marriages, you will know that such an operation is indeed very much possible. Allow yourself to imagine for a moment these non-whites being sent out on a one-way flight. Send them over first class if we have to. Send them on cruise liners. What a glorious thought. But to those defeatists that believe the cleansing of White homelands is not feasible, in that case - if you truly believe this - you are in effect declaring the very survival and advancement of the White Race to be 'unrealistic' and you might as well go and bed down with a brute - gook, piccaninny, Dravidian, Australian Aborigine, or whatever takes your fancy. Better still, lay down and die in a ditch somewhere. Seriously.

We must always remember the horrible lessons from the laboratory of India. To paraphrase the great Ben Klassen ever so slightly, I will leave you with the following thought: 

'Yes, the lesson is overwhelmingly clear to even the most naive student of history and that is: if the White Race is to be saved from mongrelization and destruction by the black cancer in our midst the only answer is to ship the blacks back to Africa from whence they were dragged by their 'chosen' slave traders.'

James Mac.

No comments:

Post a Comment